Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Oct 26, 2026; 18(10): 125689
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.125689
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.125689
Table 3 Organ-specific repair compartments, mechanistic evidence, memory, and reversibility
| Organ/context and compartment | Mechanism: Model and evidence grade | Memory: Directness and boundary | Reversibility/translational limit |
| Lung/IPF and postviral injury. ATII and airway progenitors; fibroblasts and immune niche are separate | Strong in selected mouse ATII-senescence, transitional-state, and mechanical-tension experiments; human observations support relevance[17,27,33] | Direct cultured fibroblast mechanical retention[13]. Postviral niche persistence is distinct from cell-autonomous epithelial memory[42] | Preclinical effects are context-specific; the open-label senolytic pilot establishes feasibility, not antifibrotic efficacy[23] |
| Kidney/AKI-CKD. Differentiated proximal tubular epithelia | Direct G2/M and ferroptotic-stress perturbation in mouse injury models; strong/moderate within those mechanisms. Human failed-repair signatures are associative[9,19,47] | Direct, moderate post-obstructive persistence and senolytic-response evidence, not epithelial-specific ablation[20]; not every failed-repair signature meets memory criteria | Partial experimental benefit does not establish full renal reconstruction or reprogramming of surviving cells |
| Liver/steatohepatitis, cirrhosis, and experimental regression. Hepatocytes, ductular/progenitor-associated cells, macrophages, stellate cells | Moderate direct ductular/Hedgehog mechanism in mouse models; human cirrhotic niche interactions add distinct evidence[10,26] | Macrophage epigenetic adaptation during ongoing disease is inferred memory[43]. Direct sensitized stellate-cell reactivation follows experimental regression[52] | Partial stromal inactivation differs from memory erasure. Arid1a deletion supports murine fibrosis reduction/regression, not human efficacy[63] |
| Intestine/fibrostricturing Crohn’s disease. Crypt stem cells and fibroblasts are distinct | Moderate direct cadherin-11 fibroblast evidence from patient-derived cells and experimental colitis fibrosis[56] | Emerging/unproven for stem-cell memory or an autonomous epithelial cause of fibrostenosis | Stromal pathway modification is not demonstrated restoration of crypt function or established stricture reversal |
| Heart/early injury vs established scar. Cardiomyocytes and resident fibroblast lineages | Strong direct lineage/ablation evidence for periostin-positive myofibroblast contribution to mouse scar and necessary acute healing[57] | Post-injury deactivation is observed; retained pathogenic responsiveness and therapeutic memory erasure are not established by that observation alone[57] | Experimental cardiac lineage conversion[58] and negative chronic-scar cell therapy[7] address different stages; neither establishes human scar reversal |
| Skin/experimental scarring and systemic sclerosis. Dermal fibroblast and adiponectin-marked lineages | Strong lineage/functional support for selected dermal populations; lineage origin alone does not establish every population’s necessity[59,60] | Direct ex vivo TGFB2 enhancer-memory evidence in systemic-sclerosis fibroblasts[14]; not all progenitors | Enhancer perturbability and lineage plasticity do not establish complete or safe human tissue reversal |
| Bone marrow/myelofibrosis models. Hematopoietic progenitors interact with distinct stromal populations | Strong Gli1 lineage/ablation evidence in ThPO/JAK2-associated models; LepR/PDGFRα evidence in a separate marrow model; supportive human findings[11,61] | Emerging/inferred memory: These studies do not perform a definitive retained-state withdrawal/rechallenge test | Preclinical stromal targeting does not establish durable human memory erasure; Gli1 and LepR labels are not assumed equivalent |
- Citation: Li JP, Chen XY, Wang Q, Du YY, Guo TT, Lin JN, Fu JY, Xie ML, Liu JH, Gao JL, Wang MM, Luo S. Regenerative-system dysfunction in organ fibrosis: Maladaptive regeneration, fibrotic memory, and therapeutic reprogramming. World J Stem Cells 2026; 18(10): 125689
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v18/i10/125689.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.125689