BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Stem Cells. Oct 26, 2026; 18(10): 125616
Published online Oct 26, 2026. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.125616
Table 3 Qualitative comparison of antler stem cells with established mesenchymal stem cell sources
Cell source
Proliferative capacity
Immunogenicity
Differentiation tendency
Secretome/EV characteristics
Translational maturity
AnSCsHigh in selected populations; prolonged expansion and low senescence reportedLiving cells are xenogeneic; EV immunogenicity remains insufficiently definedStrong osteogenic and chondrogenic activity; population-dependent heterogeneityRegeneration-associated proteins, miRNAs and metabolites; relatively high EV production reportedPreclinical; no human trials
Bone marrow MSCsModerate; decreases with donor age and passageGenerally low but not absent in allogeneic useWell-established osteogenic, chondrogenic and adipogenic differentiationExtensively characterized immunomodulatory and trophic secretomeExtensive preclinical and clinical experience
Adipose-derived MSCsModerate to high; relatively abundant sourceGenerally low but not absentStrong adipogenic potential; osteogenic and chondrogenic capacityAngiogenic and immunomodulatory secretomeExtensive preclinical and growing clinical experience
Umbilical cord/Wharton’s jelly MSCsHigh; relatively low senescenceGenerally low among human allogeneic sourcesMultilineage differentiation, although protocol-dependentStrong immunomodulatory and trophic activityAdvanced preclinical and clinical development
Dental pulp MSCsHigh in some comparative studiesGenerally low but source- and activation-dependentStrong odontogenic and neuroectoderm-associated potential; variable adipogenesisNeurotrophic, angiogenic and immunomodulatory factorsMainly preclinical and early clinical development


Write to the Help Desk