BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Aug 26, 2025; 17(8): 104930
Published online Aug 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i8.104930
Table 2 Comparison of mesenchymal stem cell sources and their characteristics[9-11]
Source
Method of procurement
Advantages
Disadvantages
BM-MSCsIsolated from BM aspirationPotential to differentiate into hepatocytes, much like AD-MSCs; short culture timeInvasive and painful procedure; use of anesthesia; cell yield, longevity and potential for differentiation diminishes with donor age
UC-MSCsIsolated from the placenta, amnion and UC blood after birthAvoidance of invasive procedures; abundance; reliability of sample collection; lack of transmission of herpes viruses; higher expansion and engraftment capacity than BM-MSCsUC-MSCs may not have adipogenic potential; less osteogenesis potential
AD-MSCsIsolated from liposuction, lipoplasty or lipectomy materialsEasy to access; abundant throughout the body; secrete cytokines and growth factors with anti-inflammatory, antiapoptotic and immunomodulatory properties; lower risk of immune rejection because of the absence of MHC-II antigen expressionInferior osteogenic and chondrogenic potential in comparison to BM-MSCs
DT-MSCsIsolated from tooth extraction or root canal surgery materialsAccessible source; higher frequency of colony forming cells from dental pulp compared to those from BMDifficult and invasive procedure; ectomesenchymal and periodontal tissues affect MSC properties
MSC-ExosIsolated from the cultural supernatant of MSCs using high speed centrifugationEasy to obtain in large quantities from immortalized cells; lower immunogenicity; less possibility of graft rejection; higher safety profile due to the nanoscale sizeFast clearance of MSC-Exos limit their long-term therapeutic effects; heterogeneity of MSC-Exos due to different culture conditions and cell passages


Write to the Help Desk