Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Jun 26, 2025; 17(6): 103775
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i6.103775
Published online Jun 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i6.103775
Table 2 Comparison of regulatory frameworks for stromal vascular fraction therapy
Regulatory agency | Classification of SVF | Key requirements for approval | Pathway to market |
FDA (United States) | Biological product or medical device | Comprehensive preclinical and clinical data. GMP. Detailed characterization of SVF | Investigational New Drug application. Biologics license application or device approval |
EMA (EU) | Advanced therapy medicinal product | Robust clinical trial data. Compliance with GMP. Safety and efficacy demonstration | Marketing authorization application. Scientific advice and protocol assistance |
Health Canada | Biological drug | Evidence of safety, efficacy, and quality. Adherence to GMP | Clinical trial application. New drug submission |
TGA (Australia) | Biological therapeutic | Demonstrated safety and efficacy. Quality manufacturing processes | TGA submission |
PMDA (Japan) | Regenerative medicine product | Extensive clinical data. Compliance with good clinical practice | Clinical trial notification. Marketing authorization |
- Citation: Jeyaraman N, Shrivastava S, Rangarajan RV, Nallakumarasamy A, Ramasubramanian S, Devadas AG, Rupert S, Jeyaraman M. Challenges in the clinical translation of stromal vascular fraction therapy in regenerative medicine. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(6): 103775
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v17/i6/103775.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v17.i6.103775