©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Stem Cells. Dec 26, 2025; 17(12): 112990
Published online Dec 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.112990
Published online Dec 26, 2025. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.112990
Table 2 Circulating tumor cell detection methods: Types, principles, and key features
| Method type | Detection principle | Technologies | Advantages | Limitations |
| Label-dependent | Antigen-based (surface markers) | CellSearch® (EpCAM+). HER2, CD45-based | FDA-approved. High specificity for epithelial CTCs | Misses EMT/mesenchymal CTCs. Marker heterogeneity limits sensitivity |
| Label-independent | Physical properties: Size, density, deformability | Parsortix®. Filtration. Microfluidics | Captures broader CTC spectrum. Detects EMT-like CTCs | Lower specificity. Overlap with normal blood cells |
| Combination methods | Antigen + physical property integration | Microfluidic chips with antibodies | Improved sensitivity and specificity. Better for rare subtypes | More complex and costly |
| CTC cluster detection | Enrichment of tumor cell aggregates | Size-based filters. Inertial focusing | Important for early metastasis. Reflects high aggressiveness | Rare and fragile. Difficult to preserve integrity during handling |
| Single-cell analysis | High-resolution detection of individual CTCs | DEPArray. RareCyte. MCA/gel-based | Enables genomic/proteomic profiling. Detects rare variants | Low throughput. Requires optimization and high cost |
- Citation: Azizi Z, Er Urganci B, Acikbas I. Breast cancer stem cells and circulating tumor cells: Dual drivers of progression and relapse. World J Stem Cells 2025; 17(12): 112990
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v17/i12/112990.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v17.i12.112990