©The Author(s) 2018.
World J Stem Cells. Jul 26, 2018; 10(7): 82-105
Published online Jul 26, 2018. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v10.i7.82
Published online Jul 26, 2018. doi: 10.4252/wjsc.v10.i7.82
Table 1 Faecal incontinence models employed in published preclinical studies and their types of reparation systems
| Surgical injury | Crioinjury | Pudendal nerve crush | No injury |
| Section | 2 | 1[43] | 3 |
| Anterior: 2 | |||
| Left lateral: 9[43] | |||
| Posterior subtotal: 3 | |||
| Proctoepisiotomy: 1 | |||
| 25% excision: 4 | |||
| 50% excision (IAS: 1) (both: 3) | |||
| Total excision EAS: 1 | |||
| Type of reparations employed | |||
| Surgical repair | No repair | Substitution | Not applicable |
| 6 | Crioinjury: 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Randomized 2[39,64] | Section: 9[39,43,64] Excision: 7 | ||
- Citation: Trébol J, Carabias-Orgaz A, García-Arranz M, García-Olmo D. Stem cell therapy for faecal incontinence: Current state and future perspectives. World J Stem Cells 2018; 10(7): 82-105
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1948-0210/full/v10/i7/82.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.4252/wjsc.v10.i7.82