BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2027; 33(2): 123951
Published online Jan 14, 2027. doi: 10.3748/wjg.123951
Table 1 Baseline characteristics according to early biochemical drainage response after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, n (%)/mean ± SD
Variable
No response
Response
P value
n618278
Age, years57.68 ± 14.3257.50 ± 15.690.867
Male sex411 (66.5)178 (64.0)0.518
Initial ERCP442 (71.5)238 (85.6)< 0.001
Main diagnosis0.001
Stone disease436 (70.6)225 (80.9)
Malignant stricture89 (14.4)36 (12.9)
Benign stricture80 (12.9)12 (4.3)
Other biliary disease6 (1.0)0 (0.0)
Clonorchiasis5 (0.8)4 (1.4)
Biliary dilation of unknown cause2 (0.3)1 (0.4)
Drainage strategy< 0.001
ENBD only347 (56.1)203 (73.0)
ENBD + stent87 (14.1)26 (9.4)
No continuous drainage device9 (1.5)4 (1.4)
Stent only175 (28.3)45 (16.2)
Common bile duct diameter, mm10.15 ± 6.0111.53 ± 6.160.002
Stone clearance< 0.001
No/partial clearance47 (7.6)14 (5.0)
Complete clearance405 (65.5)230 (82.7)
Baseline Tbil87.75 ± 118.75111.36 ± 98.090.004
Baseline Dbil68.85 ± 99.2685.42 ± 75.870.013
Baseline ALP234.44 ± 213.50269.77 ± 192.430.019
Baseline GGT328.31 ± 349.96539.38 ± 585.05< 0.001
Baseline TBA192.09 ± 270.53315.57 ± 537.64< 0.001
Baseline WBC7.97 ± 4.149.37 ± 4.84< 0.001


Write to the Help Desk