©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Feb 7, 2026; 32(5): 113592
Published online Feb 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.113592
Published online Feb 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.113592
Table 1 Characteristics of deep learning networks for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma from computed tomography images, mean ± SD
| Ref. | Method | Base network | Type of CT | Train set | Test set | Validation set | ACC | Sen | Spe | AUC | DICE |
| Wang et al[21] | HCCNet and NoduleNet | ResNet | NCCT/CECT | 7512 | 385/556 | 0.81/0.81 | 0.78/0.89 | 0.84/0.74 | 0.89/0.88 | ||
| Ling et al[22] | 3D ResNet | ResNet | CECT | 480 or 481 | 120 or 121 | 0.92 (0.87, 0.96) | 0.95 (0.90, 1) | 0.88 (0.82, 0.91) | 0.96 (0.93, 0.98) | ||
| Guo et al[23] | ALARM | 3D ResNet50 and nnUNet | CECT | 924 | 231/703 | 0.92/0.94 | 0.89/0.93 | 0.90/0.92 | |||
| Kim et al[24] | MASK R-NN | ResNet101 and UNet and FPN and RPN | CECT | 568 | 589 | 0.85 | 0.96 | ||||
| Shan et al[25] | 3D ResUNet | ResUNet | CECT | 0.88 | |||||||
| Zossou et al[26] | RA-UNet | UNet | CT | 4536 slices | 315 slices | 1134 slices | 0.94 | 0.94 | 0.88 | ||
| Chen et al[27] | SED | UNet and DenseUNet | CT | 4000 slices | 300 slices | 800 slices | 0.99 | 0.95 | 0.75 | ||
| Gao et al[28] | STIC | CNN and gated RNN | CECT | 499 | 113/111 | 0.93 ± 0.04 | 0.93 ± 0.10 | 0.94 ± 0.04 | 0.99 ± 0.01 | ||
| Rocha et al[29] | CNN | CNN | CECT | 317 | 79 | 0.95 | 0.92 ± 0.01 | 0.99 ± 0.00 | |||
| Khan et al[30] | Multi-modal deep neural network | AlexNet | CECT | 248 | 75 | 75 | 0.96 | > 0.94 | > 0.98 | 0.83 | |
| Balagourouchetty et al[31] | FCNet | GoogleNet | CECT | 444 | 190 | 0.97 | 0.995 |
- Citation: Chen Y, Zhang Q, Zhang MY. Deep learning techniques for using computed tomography imaging for hepatocellular carcinoma diagnosis, treatment and prognosis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(5): 113592
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i5/113592.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i5.113592