Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 28, 2026; 32(48): 121888
Published online Dec 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121888
Published online Dec 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121888
Table 2 Characteristic comparisons for hepatic artery bypass between two groups, n (%)
| Characteristics | GSV conduit group (n = 34) | Arterial conduit group (n = 33) | P value |
| Causes for HAB | |||
| Small caliber arteries (< 2 mm) | 16 (47.1) | 17 (51.5) | 0.715 |
| Short stumps | 12 (35.3) | 11 (33.3) | 0.866 |
| Multiple hepatic arteries | 5 (14.7) | 5 (15.2) | 1 |
| HA dissection | 1 (2.9) | 3 (9.1) | 0.356 |
| Types of HAB | 0.614 | ||
| Supra-celiac | 33 (97.1) | 31 (93.9) | |
| Infra-renal | 1 (2.9) | 2 (6.1) |
- Citation: Li B, Wei XZ, Song JL, Lv T, Yang J, Ma YK, Zhao JC, Jiang M, Yang JY, Huang B. Arterial vs venous conduits for hepatic artery bypass in pediatric living donor liver transplantation: A retrospective study. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(48): 121888
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i48/121888.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121888