BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 14, 2026; 32(46): 121223
Published online Dec 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121223
Table 4 Performance of different models for predicting advanced adenoma
Model
Area under the curve (95%CI)
Threshold
Sensitivity
Specificity
Training
XGBOOST (probability)0.988 (0.980-0.996)≥ 50%96.23%99.86%
LASSO (probability)0.682 (0.596-0.768)≥ 7.43%50.94%84.77%
Decision tree (1 vs 0)0.667 (0.602-0.733)≥ 135.85%97.60%
NNET (1 vs 0)0.575 (0.527-0.624)≥ 19.43%99.58%
SVM (1 vs 0)0.519 (0.493-0.545)≥ 13.77%100.00%
Logistic model (probability)0.691 (0.607-0.774)≥ 8.87%50.94%85.47%
Internal validation
XGBOOST (probability)0.825 (0.766-0.883)≥ 50%63.46%99.86%
LASSO (probability)0.616 (0.538-0.693)≥ 7.43%26.92%83.36%
Decision tree (1 vs 0)0.546 (0.502-0.590)≥ 111.54%97.60%
NNET (1 vs 0)0.492 (0.488-0.497)≥ 10.00%98.45%
SVM (1 vs 0)0.499 (0.498-0.501)≥ 10.00%99.86%
Logistic model (probability)0.622 (0.545-0.698)≥ 8.87%26.92%84.06%
External validation
XGBOOST (probability)0.767 (0.642-0.892)≥ 50%61.54%90.35%
LASSO (probability)0.500 (0.500-0.500)≥ 7.43%--
Decision tree (1 vs 0)0.561 (0.477-0.646)≥ 123.08%89.19%
NNET (1 vs 0)0.552 (0.489-0.615)≥ 111.54%98.84%
SVM (1 vs 0)0.500 (0.500-0.500)≥ 1--
Logistic model (probability)0.706 (0.602-0.809)≥ 8.87%69.23%67.95%


Write to the Help Desk