Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Dec 7, 2026; 32(45): 118839
Published online Dec 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.118839
Published online Dec 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.118839
Table 6 Postoperative complications, n (%)
| Indicators | Laparoscopic group (n = 100) | Robotic group (n = 100) | χ2 | P value |
| Postoperative haemorrhage | 2 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| Incision infection | 1 (1.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| Rectovaginal fistula | 2 (2.00) | 0 (0.00) | ||
| Voiding dysfunction | 3 (3.00) | 2 (2.00) | ||
| Anastomotic leakage | 2 (2.00) | 5 (5.00) | ||
| Total | 10 (10.00) | 7 (7.00) | 0.579 | 0.447 |
- Citation: Zhang C, Xue RF. Robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic-assisted radical resection for rectal cancer: A comparison of surgical indices, postoperative recovery, and complications. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(45): 118839
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i45/118839.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.118839