Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2026; 32(44): 121972
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121972
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121972
Table 1 Comparative analysis of natural enzymes and nanozymes
| Feature | Natural enzymes | Nanozymes | GI oncology relevance | Ref. |
| Composition | Proteins or RNA | Metals, metal oxides, carbon, etc | Nanozymes possess a high density of active sites | [22] |
| Selectivity | High substrate specificity | Broad-spectrum/low specificity | Beneficial for multi-target TME modulation | [19] |
| Stability | Low (susceptible to protease, heat) | Extremely high (chemically robust) | Resists gastric acid and proteolytic enzymes in GI tract | [19] |
| Catalytic activity | High turnover rate (Kcat) | Tunable, pH/light/H2O2 responsive | Allows selective activation in acidic TME | [23] |
| Production cost | High (complex preparation/purification) | Low (facile chemical synthesis) | Enables large-scale clinical translate/screening | [24] |
| Multifunctionality | Single catalytic function | Integration with imaging/therapy | Facilitates theranostics (diagnosis + therapy) | [25] |
- Citation: Tang YC, Gao RP, Lv YX, Wang Y, Guo XB. Applications of nanozymes in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(44): 121972
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i44/121972.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121972