BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2026; 32(44): 121972
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121972
Table 1 Comparative analysis of natural enzymes and nanozymes
Feature
Natural enzymes
Nanozymes
GI oncology relevance
Ref.
CompositionProteins or RNAMetals, metal oxides, carbon, etcNanozymes possess a high density of active sites[22]
SelectivityHigh substrate specificityBroad-spectrum/low specificityBeneficial for multi-target TME modulation[19]
StabilityLow (susceptible to protease, heat)Extremely high (chemically robust)Resists gastric acid and proteolytic enzymes in GI tract[19]
Catalytic activityHigh turnover rate (Kcat)Tunable, pH/light/H2O2 responsiveAllows selective activation in acidic TME[23]
Production costHigh (complex preparation/purification)Low (facile chemical synthesis)Enables large-scale clinical translate/screening[24]
MultifunctionalitySingle catalytic functionIntegration with imaging/therapyFacilitates theranostics (diagnosis + therapy)[25]


Write to the Help Desk