BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Cohort Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2026; 32(43): 121090
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121090
Figure 4
Figure 4 Associations between postoperative drainage methods and inflammatory and nutritional indicators following duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection. A: Model 1. The crude associations between drainage methods and postoperative indicators were assessed using analysis of covariance. Model 1 was adjusted for preoperative baseline values; B: Model 2. Based on model 1, adjustments for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, year of admission, lesion location, and titanium clip closure status were made using analysis of covariance to comprehensively control for potential confounding by baseline patient characteristics and analyze the associations between drainage methods and postoperative indicators. aP < 0.05. bP < 0.01. cP < 0.001. ANCOVA: Analysis of covariance; CI: Confidence interval; WBC: White blood cell; TP: Total protein; Neu%: Neutrophil percentage; ALB: Albumin.


Write to the Help Desk