Complete clip closure with staged triple-lumen feeding tube reduces delayed adverse events after duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection

Table 5 Associations between postoperative drainage methods and inflammatory and nutritional indicators following duodenal endoscopic submucosal dissection

	Model 1				Model 2
	F value	P value	AMD	R2 value	F value	P value	AMD	R2 value
WBC-POD 1	4.303	0.040	-0.120	0.919	6.373	0.013	-0.140	0.927
WBC-POD 3	1.534	0.217	0.460	0.071	1.669	0.198	0.490	0.073
WBC-POD 5	0.426	0.515	-0.240	0.002	0.357	0.551	-0.220	0.004
Neu%-POD 1	19.084	< 0.001	-1.920	0.804	16.507	< 0.001	-1.820	0.811
ALB-POD 1	11.437	< 0.001	0.400	0.959	11.120	< 0.001	0.410	0.960
ALB-POD 3	0.518	0.473	-0.350	0.045	0.151	0.698	-0.190	0.075
ALB-POD 5	0.552	0.459	0.360	0.040	0.260	0.610	0.260	0.059
TP-POD 1	16.221	< 0.001	0.880	0.945	14.228	< 0.001	0.850	0.946
TP-POD 3	0.674	0.413	0.690	0.017	0.141	0.708	0.320	0.044
TP-POD 5	0.350	0.555	0.440	0.002	0.830	0.364	0.700	0.017

Model 1 was adjusted for preoperative baseline values only. Model 2 was adjusted for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, year of admission, lesion location, and titanium clip closure status. Due to missing data, neutrophil percentage was available only on postoperative day 1. Adjusted mean difference (the difference in postoperative indicator means after adjustment for age, gender, body mass index, comorbidity, lesion location, and titanium clip closure status). F value calculated analysis of covariance test statistic. R² value coefficient of determination. WBC: White blood cell; TP: Total protein; Neu%: Neutrophil percentage; ALB: Albumin; POD: Postoperative day.