BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2026; 32(43): 120660
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120660
Table 3 Differences in white light endoscopy features, n (%)
Item
Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 34)
High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 40)
Intramucosal carcinoma (n = 74)
Submucosal carcinoma (n = 15)
P value
Lesion location (%)0.892
Greater curvature5 (17.2)3 (8.8)12 (16.4)1 (6.7)
Lesser curvature10 (34.5)9 (26.5)19 (26.0)4 (26.7)
Anterior wall3 (10.3)2 (5.9)7 (9.6)1 (6.7)
Posterior wall11 (14.4)20 (58.8)35 (47.9)9 (60.0)
Paris classification (%)0.001
Elevated13 (38.2)a3 (7.5)a7 (9.5)a1 (6.7)a
Flat20 (58.8)a28 (70.0)a56 (75.7)a9 (60.0)a
Depressed1 (2.9)a2 (5.0)a2 (2.7)a1 (6.7)a
Mixed0a7 (17.5)a9 (12.2)a4 (26.7)a
Roughness (%)18 (52.9)23 (57.5)49 (66.2)10 (66.7)0.536
Redness (%)20 (58.8)31 (77.5)55 (74.3)7 (46.7)0.057
Whitening (%)5 (14.7)01 (1.4)00.005
Ulceration or erosion (%)6 (17.6)7 (17.5)15 (20.3)4 (26.7)0.876
White fur/coating (%)4 (11.8)4 (10.0)16 (21.6)4 (26.7)0.248
Spontaneous bleeding (%)02 (5.0)4 (5.4)00.573
Fold abnormality (%)0000
Poor peristalsis (%)005 (6.8)1 (6.7)0.214


Write to the Help Desk