Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2026; 32(43): 120562
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120562
Published online Nov 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120562
Table 2 Predictive performance of seven machine learning models of all classifiers across different feature sets, area under the curve (95% confidence interval)
| KNN | SVM | LR | DT | GBDT | RF | XGBoost | ||
| Clinical + rad-preop | Training set | 0.966 (0.947-0.984) | 0.928 (0.893-0.964) | 0.941 (0.91-0.973) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.973 (0.954-0.992) | 0.909 (0.871-0.946) | 0.987 (0.974-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.76 (0.631-0.888) | 0.848 (0.936-0.98) | 0.867 (0.772-0.963) | 0.756 (0.64-0.87) | 0.845 (0.799-0.892) | 0.76 (0.636-0.884) | 0.864 (0.817-0.91) | |
| External validation set | 0.752 (0.622-0.883) | 0.849 (0.747-0.951) | 0.84 (0.735-0.945) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.825 (0.715-0.935) | 0.752 (0.625-0.878) | 0.83 (0.72-0.939) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (5 mm) | Training set | 0.97 (0.954-0.987) | 0.957 (0.933-0.982) | 0.963 (0.94-0.986) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.986 (0.974-0.999) | 0.917 (0.88-0.953) | 0.993 (0.984-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.938 (0.911-0.964) | 0.894 (0.852-0.935) | 0.865 (0.819-0.911) | 0.751 (0.618-0.883) | 0.933 (0.898-0.967) | 0.839 (0.788-0.89) | 0.839 (0.928-0.985) | |
| External validation set | 0.81 (0.692-0.928) | 0.863 (0.761-0.965) | 0.859 (0.752-0.966) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.819 (0.706-0.932) | 0.824 (0.709-0.94) | 0.816 (0.702-0.93) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (10 mm) | Training set | 0.952 (0.929-0.975) | 0.942 (0.912-0.972) | 0.95 (0.921-0.979) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.973 (0.953-0.993) | 0.913 (0.875-0.951) | 0.987 (0.975-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.833 (0.717-0.949) | 0.898 (0.859-0.936) | 0.898 (0.859-0.937) | 0.736 (0.678-0.794) | 0.907 (0.878-0.943) | 0.803 (0.688-0.919) | 0.904 (0.869-0.939) | |
| External validation set | 0.818 (0.7-0.935) | 0.876 (0.784-0.969) | 0.873 (0.775-0.971) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.871 (0.773-0.969) | 0.795 (0.674-0.917) | 0.855 (0.749-0.961) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (15 mm) | Training set | 0.96 (0.94-0.98) | 0.941 (0.908-0.974) | 0.95 (0.919-0.981) | 0.757 (0.701-0.814) | 0.976 (0.958-0.994) | 0.913 (0.876-0.95) | 0.985 (0.97-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.927 (0.893-0.96) | 0.875 (0.784-0.967) | 0.873 (0.777-0.9969) | 0.725 (0.599-0.851) | 0.913 (0.876-0.951) | 0.833 (0.72-0.946) | 0.839 (0.74-0.937) | |
| External validation set | 0.851 (0.747-0.954) | 0.863 (0.763-0.962) | 0.856 (0.754-0.958) | 0.716 (0.597-0.836) | 0.84 (0.734-0.946) | 0.815 (0.7-0.93) | 0.833 (0.727-0.939) | |
| Clinical + rad-preop + peri-necrotic (20 mm) | Training set | 0.971 (0.955-0.987) | 0.986 (0.974-0.997) | 0.958 (0.934-0.982) | 0.767 (0.711-0.823) | 0.927 (0895-0.959) | 0.918 (0.885-0.952) | 0.995 (0.99-1) |
| Internal validation set | 0.771 (0.712-0.831) | 0.792 (0.67-0.913) | 0.79 (0.732-0.849) | 0.742 (0.684-0.8) | 0.801 (0.676-0.926) | 0.81 (0.691-0.929) | 0.834 (0.72-0.948) | |
| External validation set | 0.717 (0.583-0.851) | 0.795 (0.676-0.915) | 0.773 (0.645-0.9) | 0.664 (0.537-0.791) | 0.763 (0.637-0.889) | 0.753 (0.625-0.881) | 0.782 (0.654-0.91) |
- Citation: Liu T, Wu C, Dong TT, Jia YY, Zhu YY, Wei CM, Duan Y, Li YX, Nie F. Optimal 10-mm window: Integrating peri-ablation radiomics with preoperative features to predict early hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence after thermal ablation. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(43): 120562
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i43/120562.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.120562