Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2026; 32(41): 121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Figure 6 Subgroup analyses of adjusted polyp detection rate across withdrawal times.
A: Adjusted polyp detection rate (PDR) plotted against effective withdrawal time stratified by bowel preparation quality; B: Adjusted PDR plotted against standard withdrawal time stratified by bowel preparation quality; C: Adjusted PDR plotted against effective withdrawal time stratified by physician seniority; D: Adjusted PDR plotted against standard withdrawal time stratified by physician seniority. PDR was adjusted for age, sex, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and endoscopist experience. PDR: Polyp detection rate; BBPS: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
- Citation: Peng ZY, Li JX, Huang Y, Wang XY, An Q, Yin ZY, Li YR, Sun JY, Wang YW, Yang X, Zhang Q, Wang XM, Zhang SY, Pei ZC. Disentangling true inspection time from therapeutic intervals: Validation of effective withdrawal time as a colonoscopy quality metric. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(41): 121527
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i41/121527.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121527