Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2026; 32(41): 121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Figure 5 Subgroup analyses of adjusted adenoma detection rate across withdrawal times.
A: Adjusted adenoma detection rate (ADR) plotted against effective withdrawal time (EWT) stratified by polyp number; B: Adjusted ADR plotted against standard withdrawal time (SWT) stratified by polyp number; C: Adjusted ADR plotted against EWT stratified by physician seniority; D: Adjusted ADR plotted against SWT stratified by physician seniority; E: Adjusted ADR plotted against EWT stratified by bowel preparation quality; F: Adjusted ADR plotted against SWT stratified by bowel preparation quality. The smooth curves represent the adjusted ADR (left Y-axis), while the background bar histograms indicate the number of procedures (right Y-axis). ADR was adjusted for age, sex, Boston Bowel Preparation Scale, and endoscopist experience. ADR: Adenoma detection rate; BBPS: Boston Bowel Preparation Scale.
- Citation: Peng ZY, Li JX, Huang Y, Wang XY, An Q, Yin ZY, Li YR, Sun JY, Wang YW, Yang X, Zhang Q, Wang XM, Zhang SY, Pei ZC. Disentangling true inspection time from therapeutic intervals: Validation of effective withdrawal time as a colonoscopy quality metric. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(41): 121527
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i41/121527.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121527