Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2026; 32(41): 121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Published online Nov 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121527
Figure 4 Association between withdrawal times and adjusted detection rates.
A: Adjusted adenoma detection rate (ADR) plotted against effective withdrawal time; B: Adjusted ADR plotted against standard withdrawal time; C: Adjusted polyp detection rate (PDR) plotted against effective withdrawal time; D: Adjusted PDR plotted against standard withdrawal time. ADR and PDR were adjusted for age, sex, bowel preparation quality (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale), and endoscopist experience. ADR: Adenoma detection rate; PDR: Polyp detection rate.
- Citation: Peng ZY, Li JX, Huang Y, Wang XY, An Q, Yin ZY, Li YR, Sun JY, Wang YW, Yang X, Zhang Q, Wang XM, Zhang SY, Pei ZC. Disentangling true inspection time from therapeutic intervals: Validation of effective withdrawal time as a colonoscopy quality metric. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(41): 121527
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i41/121527.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121527