Burnout and endoscopy-specific workload among gastroenterologists and gastroenterology fellows in Türkiye: A national cross-sectional survey

Table 3 Copenhagen Burnout Inventory scores by professional status and practice setting

Group	n	Personal burnout, median (IQR)	Work-related burnout, median (IQR)	Patient-related burnout, median (IQR)
All respondents	278	71 (59-83)	70 (57-82)	64 (50-76)
Gastroenterology fellows	82	72 (60-84)	68 (55-80)	65 (50-78)
Specialists completing obligatory service	42	68 (54-80)	68 (54-80)	60 (46-72)
Specialists who completed obligatory service	92	70 (58-82)	70 (56-82)	62 (48-74)
Academic faculty	62	74 (62-86)	74 (60-86)a	68 (52-80)
Public sector	246	74 (62-86)b	72 (58-84)b	66 (52-78)b
Non-public practice	32	58 (46-70)	60 (48-72)	52 (40-64)
CBI score of 50 or higher, n/N (%)	-	221/278 (79.5)	217/278 (78.1)	194/278 (69.8)

^aP = 0.04 for the post-hoc comparison of work-related burnout between academic faculty and gastroenterology fellows.

^bP < 0.001 for public sector vs non-public practice for the corresponding Copenhagen Burnout Inventory domain. The threshold-based burnout row was not included in the group comparisons shown in this table.

Copenhagen Burnout Inventory (CBI) subscale scores are presented as median (interquartile range) and were transformed to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating greater burnout. The threshold-based burnout row presents the proportion of respondents with CBI subscale scores of 50 or higher and should not be interpreted as an unbiased national prevalence estimate. Rows for professional status and practice setting represent separate stratifications. CBI: Copenhagen Burnout Inventory; IQR: Interquartile range.