BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Oct 28, 2026; 32(40): 120563
Published online Oct 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.120563
Table 2 Certainty of evidence
Quality assessment
Summary of findings
Participants (studies) follow upRisk of biasInconsistencyIndirectnessImprecisionPublication biasOverall quality of evidenceStudy event rates (%)
Relative effect (95%CI)Anticipated absolute effects
With control
With outcomes
Risk with control
Risk difference with outcomes (95%CI)
CSBM (critical outcome; better indicated by lower values)
8318 (17 studies)SeriousSeriousNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedModerate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, large effect41594159The mean CSBM in the intervention groups was 1.1 higher (1.05 to 1.16 higher)
SBM (critical outcome; better indicated by lower values)
5706 (16 studies)SeriousSeriousNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedModerate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, large effect28482858The mean SBM in the intervention groups was 1.65 higher (1.58 to 1.72 higher)
BSFS (critical outcome; better indicated by lower values)
7689 (28 studies)SeriousSeriousNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedModerate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, large effect38343855The mean BSFS in the intervention groups was 0.97 higher (0.94 to 1.01 higher)
IBS-SSS (critical outcome; better indicated by lower values)
544 (9 studies)SeriousSeriousNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedModerate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, large effect245299The mean IBS-SSS in the intervention groups was 37.34 lower (46.23 to 28.45 lower)
IBS-QOL (critical outcome; better indicated by lower values)
617 (11 studies)SeriousNo serious inconsistencyNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedHigh due to risk of bias, large effect278339The mean IBS-QOL in the intervention groups was 7.27 higher (5.32 to 9.22 higher)
Adverse events (critical outcome)
16725 (36 studies)SeriousSeriousNo serious indirectnessNo serious imprecisionUndetectedModerate due to risk of bias, inconsistency, large effect2720/8076 (33.7%)3357/8649 (38.8%)OR = 1.23 (1.15 to 1.32)Study population
337 per 100048 more per 1000 (from 32 more to 65 more)
Moderate
346 per 100048 more per 1000 (from 32 more to 65 more)


Write to the Help Desk