©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 28, 2026; 32(4): 112698
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.112698
Published online Jan 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.112698
Table 3 Sensitivity analysis with diagnostic colonoscopies excluded
| CADe use (n) | PDR % (No. of procedures) | ADR % (No. of procedures) | SSL-DR % (No. of procedures) | ||||||
| Pre | Post | P value | Pre | Post | P value | Pre | Post | P value | |
| 100% of time (2) | 93.1 (102) | 89.2 (102) | 0.46 | 78.4 (102) | 70.6 (102) | 0.26 | 19.6 (102) | 22.5 (102) | 0.73 |
| 50%-99% of time (4) | 68.2 (134) | 72.7 (44) | 0.71 | 47.0 (134) | 50 (44) | 0.86 | 16.4 (134) | 15.9 (44) | 1.00 |
| 0% of time (1) | 66.7 (3) | 66.7 (3) | 1.00 | 66.7 (3) | 0 (3) | 0.40 | 33.3 (3) | 33.3 (3) | 1.00 |
- Citation: Rao V, Walia N, Parkash N, Wanigaratne T, Henshaw S, Chen G, Lo SW, Be KH, Robertson M, Zorron Cheng Tao Pu L. Availability and use of computer-aided detection during colonoscopy: A real-world observational study at an Australian tertiary center. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(4): 112698
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i4/112698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i4.112698