Availability and use of computer-aided detection during colonoscopy: A real-world observational study at an Australian tertiary center

Table 2 Impact of computer-aided detection use frequency on polyp detection rate, adenoma detection rate, and sessile serrated lesion detection rate

CADe use (n)	PDR % (No. of procedures)				ADR % (No. of procedures)				SSL-DR % (No. of procedures)
	Pre	Post	OR (CI)	P value	Pre	Post	OR (CI)	P value	Pre	Post	OR (CI)	P value
100% (2)	82.3 (226)	78.7 (267)	0.79 (0.51-1.24)	0.31	64.2 (226)	58.1 (267)	0.77 (0.54-1.11)	0.17	19.5 (226)	18.7 (267)	0.83 (0.61-1.50)	0.83
50%-99% (4)	46.3 (393)	63.8 (105)	2.04 (1.31-3.19)	< 0.01b	29.0 (393)	41.9 (105)	1.77 (1.13-2.75)	0.01b	9.7 (393)	11.4 (105)	1.20 (0.61-2.40)	0.59
0% (1)	52.9 (17)	50.0 (14)	0.88 (0.22-3.66)	0.87	23.6 (17)	14.3 (14)	0.54 (0.083-3.51)	0.52	11.8 (17)	21.4 (14)	2.04 (0.29-14.3)	0.47

^bP < 0.05.

CADe: Computer aided detection; PDR: Polyp detection rate; ADR: Adenoma detection rate; SSL-DR: Sessile serrated lesion detection rate; CI: Confidence interval; OR: Odds ratio.