BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2026; 32(36): 119370
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.119370
Table 1 Summary of recent studies on machine learning and radiomics in acute biliary disease and surgical risk prediction
Ref.
Year
Population
Modality
Model
Key findings
Translational value
Limitations
Gap identified
Demircioğlu[31]2025Radiomics methodsImagingML frameworksReproducibility criticalHighPipeline variabilityNo clinical translation
Ma et al[32]2024Acute biliary diseaseCT radiomicsXGBoost + SHAPInterpretable early severity predictionHighSingle-centerLack of validation in cholecystitis-specific cohorts
Kenig et al[38]2024Surgical AIMixedML modelsImproved preoperative predictionModerateLimited validationLack of explainability integration
et al[37]2024Radiomics workflowCT/MRIML pipelinesImportance of pipeline standardizationHighVariabilityNo direct clinical application
Teng et al[36]2024RadiomicsImagingML modelsFocus on clinical integration challengesHighLimited deploymentLack of real-time decision tools
Sadeghi et al[40]2024Healthcare AIMixedXAI modelsExplainability improves trustHighMisinterpretation riskLimited disease-specific application
Borys et al[41]2023Imaging AIImagingSHAP/XAIEnables patient-level interpretationHighNeeds validationNot integrated in surgical workflows
Erickson et al[9]2019Imaging reviewMultimodalML overviewHighlights ML potentialLow-ModerateConceptual onlyNo clinical implementation
Bi et al[10]2019Imaging datasetsCT radiomicsML classifiersQuantifies imaging heterogeneityModerateFeature instabilityNo integration with clinical variables
Hosny et al[8]2018Imaging datasetsCT radiomicsDeep learningDemonstrates scalabilityModerateGeneralizability issuesNot tailored to acute surgical decision-making


Write to the Help Desk