BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Prospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 28, 2026; 32(36): 118689
Published online Sep 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.118689
Table 3 Association between clinical characteristics of achalasia and anti-enteric neuronal antibodies intensity, mean ± SD/n (%)/median interquartile range
Parameter
AENA moderate-positive (n = 37)
AENA strong-positive (n = 22)
P value
Demographic
Female21 (56.8)11 (50.0)0.815
Age, year46.6 ± 14.846.8 ± 13.50.959
Weight, kg60.0 ± 9.959.1 ± 11.60.770
BMI, kg/m221.9 ± 3.021.0 ± 3.30.285
Disease duration, year3.5 (2.0 to 5.0)4.7 (3.0 to 6.0)0.100
Previous intervention7 (18.9)2 (9.1)0.461
Eckardt scores6.8 ± 1.96.4 ± 1.60.395
CARS scores4.0 (3.0 to 5.0)5.0 (4.0 to 5.0)0.034a
HRM parameters
IRP, mmHg14.5 (10.2 to 19.8)22.1 (13.5 to 29.3)0.018a
BLESP, mmHg29.3 (23.2 to 33.6)32.2 (21.7 to 45.8)0.154
DCI, mmHg/second/cm56.0 (2.0 to 108.0)125.0 (0.0 to 361.0)0.223
AC subtype0.654
Type I19 (52.8)9 (42.9)
Type II17 (47.2)12 (57.1)
Barium esophagogram
Barium width, mm38.3 (35.0 to 45.0)45.0 (40.0 to 51.0)0.029a
Esophageal distortion0.503
None13 (39.4)10 (47.6)
Mild 14 (42.4)7 (33.3)
Moderate5 (15.2)1 (4.8)
Severe1 (3.0)3 (14.3)


Write to the Help Desk