Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Sep 21, 2026; 32(35): 121133
Published online Sep 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121133
Published online Sep 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.121133
Table 4 Comparative summary of major nanocarriers used in colorectal cancer drug delivery
| Nanocarrier class | Representative examples | Key properties | Main advantages in CRC | Main limitations | Typical applications in CRC |
| Polymeric nanoparticles | PLGA, PEG-PLGA, polymeric micelles, polymersomes, nanospheres | Biodegradable, tunable size and surface chemistry, controlled drug release | Good biocompatibility, sustained release, flexible ligand modification, suitable for small molecules and nucleic acids | Possible burst release, formulation complexity, scale-up challenges | Chemotherapy delivery, gene/miRNA delivery, combination therapy, targeted delivery |
| Dendrimers | PAMAM, poly(propyleneimine), poly(L-lysine) dendrimers | Highly branched 3D architecture, multiple surface groups, high loading capacity | Precise surface functionalization, strong drug/gene conjugation potential, useful for multifunctional systems | Potential toxicity at higher generations, synthesis cost, limited large-scale translation | Targeted chemotherapy, gene delivery, photothermal and photoimmunotherapy |
| Liposomes | Conventional liposomes, PEGylated liposomes, liposomal nanovaccines | Phospholipid bilayer vesicles with aqueous core, biocompatible, able to carry hydrophilic and hydrophobic cargo | Strong translational maturity, reduced systemic toxicity, good encapsulation flexibility, suitable for immunomodulators | Stability issues, leakage during storage, RES clearance if not optimized | Chemotherapy, metabolic therapy, immunotherapy, vaccine delivery |
| Nanoemulsions/Lipid nanoparticles | Nanoemulsions, solid lipid nanoparticles, lipid-based nanocarriers | Lipid-rich structure, good solubilization of hydrophobic drugs, oral-delivery potential | Improved bioavailability, useful for colon-targeted and mucosal delivery, relatively low toxicity | Physical instability, limited drug-loading for some agents, formulation sensitivity | Oral delivery, colon-specific release, hydrophobic drug delivery |
| Quantum dots | Carbon quantum dots, graphene oxide quantum dots, peptide-functionalized QDs | Strong fluorescence, tunable optical properties, nanoscale imaging capability | Theranostic potential, real-time tracking, combined imaging and treatment | Concern about long-term toxicity and clinical translation, especially for non-carbon systems | Imaging, biomarker-targeted detection, theranostics |
| Iron oxide nanoparticles | Superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, 5-FU-loaded IONPs, Fe3O4 nanocatalysts | Magnetic responsiveness, imaging capability, possible hyperthermia effects | Useful for image-guided therapy, magnetic targeting, hyperthermia, ferroptosis-related strategies | Need careful control of biodistribution and safety, variable tumor penetration | MRI contrast, magnetic hyperthermia, targeted chemotherapy, sonodynamic/chemodynamic therapy |
| Gold nanoparticles | AuNPs, antibody-conjugated AuNPs, drug-loaded AuNPs | High surface area, optical responsiveness, good surface functionalization | Useful for targeted delivery, photothermal therapy, receptor-specific systems, signal amplification | Cost, long-term accumulation concerns, translational standardization issues | Chemotherapy enhancement, receptor-targeted therapy, photothermal therapy |
| Silver nanoparticles | Citrate-coated AgNPs, surface-functionalized AgNPs | Reactive surface, antimicrobial and cytotoxic properties | Potential anticancer activity and carrier function | Greater concern about toxicity and off-target effects, less mature translational profile | Experimental cytotoxic systems, drug delivery carriers |
| CNTs | SWCNTs, MWCNTs, functionalized CNTs | High aspect ratio, large surface area, strong mechanical and thermal properties | Excellent loading capacity, membrane penetration, useful for photothermal and gene delivery strategies | Biopersistence and safety concerns, regulatory challenges | Drug delivery, gene delivery, photothermal therapy, combination therapy |
| Hydrogels/nanogel-associated systems | Thermosensitive hydrogels, injectable hydrogels, nanocomposite hydrogels | High water content, local depot effect, controlled release | Strong potential for local delivery, postoperative recurrence prevention, prolonged release | Limited systemic use, formulation-dependent stability, translation still emerging | Local drug delivery, postoperative CRC control, combination immunotherapy |
- Citation: Yang ZH, Huang QL, Luo L, Wu XX, Nie SW, Xu MM. Nanotechnology for drug delivery systems in colorectal cancer: Recent developments and future prospects. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(35): 121133
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i35/121133.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.121133