Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 14, 2026; 32(30): 119614
Published online Aug 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.119614
Published online Aug 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.119614
Table 3 Comparison of three surgical procedures for early gastric cancer
| Surgical procedures | Oncological outcomes | The incidence of complications | Risk exposure | Long-term follow-up results |
| LECS | High R0 resection rate, low recurrence rate | Low | The exposed LECS is relatively high, while the non-exposed LECS is relatively low | Long-term survival data beyond five years are still under documentation, yet notable restoration of gastric function and superior quality of life have been consistently observed |
| ESD | Higher R0 resection rate, higher recurrence rate | The incidence of bleeding and perforation is relatively high | This procedure carries a relatively high risk and poses a potential hazard for intraperitoneal seeding following perforation | The observed favorable five-year survival rate may necessitate subsequent surgical interventions |
| Traditional radical gastrectomy | High R0 resection rate and extremely low recurrence rate | High | Lower exposure risk | The five-year survival rate is high; however, long-term malnutrition leads to a decline in quality of life |
- Citation: Chen B, Han H, Zhang XX, Chen JX, Fan X. Research progress in laparoscopic endoscopic cooperative surgery for early gastric cancer: A narrative review. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(30): 119614
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i30/119614.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.119614