BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Meta-Analysis
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Figure 5
Figure 5 Meta-analysis of recurrence risk: Salvage treatment vs observation. The forest plot compares the recurrence risk between salvage treatment and observation based on nine studies reporting events in both groups. The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.40-2.02), with no statistical significance and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), suggesting inconclusive comparative effectiveness. OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.


Write to the Help Desk