©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Figure 5 Meta-analysis of recurrence risk: Salvage treatment vs observation.
The forest plot compares the recurrence risk between salvage treatment and observation based on nine studies reporting events in both groups. The pooled odds ratio was 0.89 (95% confidence interval: 0.40-2.02), with no statistical significance and negligible heterogeneity (I2 = 0%), suggesting inconclusive comparative effectiveness. OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
- Citation: Kim JH, Lee JW, Kim HJ, Hong SM, Park SJ. Is salvage treatment necessary after incomplete resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(3): 113452
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i3/113452.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452