BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 32, Issue 3
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Supplementary Materials of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Gastroenterology
ISSN
1007-9327
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Meta-Analysis
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Table 4 Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation summary of findings
Outcome
Number of participants (studies)
Effect (95%CI)
Risk of Bias
Inconsistency
Indirectness
Imprecision
Publication Bias
Certainty of evidence (GRADE)
Residual tumor after salvage treatment1223 (19 studies)Approximately 25% (12%-40%)SeriousSeriousNot seriousNot seriousNot detectedVery low
Recurrence (salvage vs observation)2022 (9 studies)OR = 0.84 (0.42-1.68)SeriousNot seriousNot seriousSeriousNot detectedLow
GRADE: Grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation; OR: Odds ratio; CI: Confidence interval.
Full Size Table
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.