©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 21, 2026; 32(3): 113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Published online Jan 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452
Table 3 Additional treatment modalities and follow-up duration, mean ± SD
| Ref. | Tumor size (mm) | Additional treatment method | Follow-up duration (month) | ||||||
| cEMR | mEMR | ESD | Hybrid ESD | EFTR | Surgery | APC | |||
| Cha et al[19] | 5.2 ± 1.7 | 16 | 5 | 39.8 (range: 24.2-119.7) | |||||
| Cha et al[20] | 4.72 | 33 | 11 | 40.5 (range: 4.27-102.7) | |||||
| Chatila et al[21] | 8.6 | 10 | |||||||
| Cheminel et al[22] | 5 (range: 2-10) | 19 | 15 | 44 | 1 | 7 | 24 (range: 2-216) | ||
| Cho et al[23] | 5.8 ± 3.2 | ||||||||
| Choi et al[24] | 5.5 ± 2.4 | 27.4 ± 16.5 | |||||||
| Chung et al[25] | 4.0 (range: 3.0-6.0) | 3 | 2 | 4 | 35 (range: 24.4-48.8) | ||||
| Dell’Unto et al[26] | 6 (range: 1.0-16.0) | 36 | |||||||
| Duan et al[27] | 8.4 (range: 7.5-10.8) | 72 | |||||||
| Heo et al[28] | 6.1 ± 2.7 | 13 (range: 3-57) | |||||||
| Hwang et al[29] | 8.6 ± 3.6 | 29.1 ± 31.3 | |||||||
| Inoue et al[30] | 5 (range: 3-13) | 24.5 (range: 6-108) | |||||||
| Jeon et al[31] | 8.9 ± 3.2 | 31 | 12 | ||||||
| Ju et al[32] | 4 (range: 2-6) | 27 | 94 | ||||||
| Kaneko et al[33] | 6.4 | 61.6 (range: 12-150) | |||||||
| Kim et al[34] | 5.0 (range: 1.0-10.0) | 31 (range: 13-121) | |||||||
| Kim et al[35] | 39.3 | ||||||||
| Kim et al[36] | 4.46 ± 2.11 | 51.85 ± 22.92 | |||||||
| Kim et al[37] | 6.3 ± 3.1 | 19.3 (range: 0-122) | |||||||
| Kusuhara et al[38] | 5 (range: 2-10) | 2 | 27 | ||||||
| Lee et al[39] | 5.4 ± 3.1 | 21 | 39 | ||||||
| Li et al[40] | 38 (range: 10-110) | 3 | 4 | 48.8 (range: 12-131) | |||||
| Moon et al[14] | 4.7 (range: 1-9) | 25 (range: 12-43) | |||||||
| Moon et al[41] | 5.7 ± 3.1 | 2 | 1 | ||||||
| Nakamura et al[42] | 5.6 ± 2.4 | 48.3 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 56.8 (range: 24-227.7) | |||
| Oh et al[43] | |||||||||
| Park et al[44] | 4.7 ± 2.7 | 1 | 71 | ||||||
| Seo et al[45] | 35.0 ± 37.6 | 16 | 7 | 19.0 (range: 1.2-57.5) | |||||
| Sun et al[13] | 9.0 ± 4.0 | ||||||||
| Sung et al[46] | 7.0 ± 2.8 | 43 | 61.4 (range: 33.4-125.3) | ||||||
| Takita et al[47] | 5.7 | 4 | 2 | 18.5 (range: 5-107) | |||||
| Wang et al[48] | 6.9 ± 3.3 | 31 (range: 6-97) | |||||||
| Zheng et al[49] | 6.3 ± 2.9 | 28.3 (range: 6-98) | |||||||
| Zhuang et al[50] | 6.5 | ||||||||
- Citation: Kim JH, Lee JW, Kim HJ, Hong SM, Park SJ. Is salvage treatment necessary after incomplete resection of rectal neuroendocrine tumors: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(3): 113452
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i3/113452.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i3.113452