Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2026; 32(29): 116893
Published online Aug 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.116893
Published online Aug 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.116893
Figure 2 Adenoma detection rate.
Conventional colonoscopy vs computer-aided detection overall, in low-volume endoscopists and high-volume endoscopists. P values refer to P-interaction in a generalized linear model with binomial family and identity link. ADR: Adenoma detection rate; CC: Conventional colonoscopy; CADe: Computer-aided detection; LVE: Low-volume endoscopists; HVE: High-volume endoscopists.
- Citation: Tontini GE, Dioscoridi L, Salerno R, Aldinio G, Buonocore MR, Cesaro P, Conforti F, Consonni D, Cottone I, Dabizzi E, Mantia B, Monica F, Mutignani M, Olivari N, Picardi G, Salvi D, Scaramella L, Schettino M, Topa M, Vecchi M, Elli L. Impact of computer-aided polyp detection in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(29): 116893
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i29/116893.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.116893