BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Clinical Trials Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2026; 32(29): 116893
Published online Aug 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.116893
Table 3 Polyp detection rate and adenoma detection rate: Conventional colonoscopy vs computer-aided detection overall and for the main indications, n (%)
PDR
P valueADR
P value
CC
CADe
CC
CADe
Overall93 (45.4)84 (41.2)0.3966 (32.2)60 (29.4)0.54
Primary screening99 (24.2)21 (39.6)18 (39.1)0.9615 (28.3)13 (28.3)1
Secondary screening60 (14.7)15 (51.7)16 (51.6)0.9913 (44.8)15 (48.4)0.78
Surveillance52 (12.7)13 (59.1)17 (56.7)0.8611 (50)15 (50)1
Diagnostic198 (48.4)44 (43.6)33 (34)0.1727 (26.7)17 (17.5)0.12

  • Citation: Tontini GE, Dioscoridi L, Salerno R, Aldinio G, Buonocore MR, Cesaro P, Conforti F, Consonni D, Cottone I, Dabizzi E, Mantia B, Monica F, Mutignani M, Olivari N, Picardi G, Salvi D, Scaramella L, Schettino M, Topa M, Vecchi M, Elli L. Impact of computer-aided polyp detection in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(29): 116893
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i29/116893.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.116893

Write to the Help Desk