BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Clinical Trials Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Aug 7, 2026; 32(29): 116893
Published online Aug 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.116893
Table 1 Baseline characteristics, per protocol population, median (interquartile range)/n (%)

Overall, n = 409
Conventional colonoscopy, n = 205
CADe, n = 204
Age (years)60 (52-68)60 (52-67)59 (52-68)
Female207 (50.6)100 (48.8)107 (52.5)
Colonoscopy indication
Primary screening99 (24.2)53 (25.9)46 (22.6)
Secondary screening60 (14.7)29 (14.2)31 (15.2)
Surveillance52 (12.7)22 (10.7)30 (14.7)
Diagnostic198 (48.4)101 (49.3)97 (47.6)
Boston Bowel Preparation Scale score8 (6-9)8 (6-9)8 (6-9)
Adverse events0 (0)0 (0)0 (0)
Time to cecum (minutes)10 (7-14)10 (7-14)10 (7-15)
Overall procedure time (minutes)22 (18-30)22 (18-30)22 (18-30)

  • Citation: Tontini GE, Dioscoridi L, Salerno R, Aldinio G, Buonocore MR, Cesaro P, Conforti F, Consonni D, Cottone I, Dabizzi E, Mantia B, Monica F, Mutignani M, Olivari N, Picardi G, Salvi D, Scaramella L, Schettino M, Topa M, Vecchi M, Elli L. Impact of computer-aided polyp detection in screening and diagnostic colonoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(29): 116893
  • URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i29/116893.htm
  • DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.116893

Write to the Help Desk