Comparison of the anastomotic effects of combined-type and whole-type magnetic rings for gastrointestinal anastomosis in beagles

doi:10.3748/wjg.118067

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 32, Issue 28

This Article

(14)

(0)

(1)

(322)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Basic Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Gastroenterol. Jul 28, 2026; 32(28): 118067
Published online Jul 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.118067

Full Size Figure Download Figure

Figure 3 Computer simulation analysis. A: Magnetic field density distribution of the conventional magnetic ring (CMR) at zero distance; B: Magnetic field density distribution of the CMR at a distance of 5 mm; C: Magnetic field distribution of a CMR; D: Magnetic field distribution when two CMRs attract each other at a distance of 5 mm; E: Magnetic field density distribution of the deformable self-assembling magnetic anastomosis ring (DSAMAR) at zero distance; F: Magnetic field density distribution of the DSAMAR at a distance of 5 mm; G: Magnetic field distribution of the DSAMAR; H: Magnetic field distribution when two DSAMARs attract each other at a distance of 5 mm.

Citation: Zhang MM, Xu SQ, Wu HX, Ren HL, Wan JH, Zhong QY, Chen MY, Zhang QF, Gong RM, Yusif-Zada K, Badarch BI, Shi AH, Lyu Y, Liu XM, Yan XP. Comparison of the anastomotic effects of combined-type and whole-type magnetic rings for gastrointestinal anastomosis in beagles. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(28): 118067
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i28/118067.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.118067

Zhang MM, Xu SQ, Wu HX, Ren HL, Wan JH, Zhong QY, Chen MY, Zhang QF, Gong RM, Yusif-Zada K, Badarch BI, Shi AH, Lyu Y, Liu XM, Yan XP. Comparison of the anastomotic effects of combined-type and whole-type magnetic rings for gastrointestinal anastomosis in beagles. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(28): 118067 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.118067]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.