BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jul 14, 2026; 32(26): 114936
Published online Jul 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.114936
Table 2 Studies (randomized controlled trials) comparing over pancreatic guidewire techniques for difficult biliary cannulation during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, n (%)/mean ± SD
Ref.
Definition of DBC
Endoscopist experience
Sample size
Baseline characterstics; age, years
Baseline characterstics; gender (male %)
Groups (n)
Successful CBD cannulation
Bleeding
Perforation
PEP
Comments
Eminler et al[25], 2019Maximum of 5 guidewire passages into PD or cannulation attempt duration 5 minutesExperts performing > 500 cases/year100WGC-PS: 52.9 ± 19.8; DGW: 56 ± 18.08WGC-PS: 16 (32); DGW: 24 (48)WGC-PS: 50; DGW: 50WGC-PS: 27 (54); DGW: 45 (90)WGC-PS: 0; DGW: 1 (2)WGC-PS: 1 (2); DGW: 0WGC-PS: 1 (2); DGW: 1 (2)PD stent placed
Laquière et al[26], 2022Guidewire passage into PD-1Experts performing > 300 cases/year142DGW: 66.9 ± 15.6; RSG: 67.3 ± 15.8DGW: 35 (51); RSG: 37 (50)DGW: 68; RSG: 74DGW: 57 (84); RSG: 37 (50)DGW: 3 (4); RSG: 0DGW: 1 (1); RSG: 0DGW: 1 (1); RSG: 4 (5); Early DGW, PD stent placed
Angsuwatcharakon et al[27], 2012Inability to cannulate within 10 minutes by expert endoscopistExpert performing > 300 cases/year for > 10 years44DGW: 66 ± 13.2; NKF: 64 ± 13.9DGW: 13 (57); NKF: 10 (48)DGW: 23; NKF: 21DGW: 17 (73.9); NKF: 17 (81)DGW: 2; NKF: 2DGW: 0; PS: 0DGW: 4; PS: 2No PD stent; no PD stent
Sasahira et al[28], 2015Cannulation attempt 10 times, up to 10 minutes29 experts; 16 trainees280N/ADGW: 74 (71.8); RSG: 67 (69)DGW: 103 (75); RSG: 96 (70)DGW: 27 (20); RSG: 23 (17)PD stent: 18 DGW, 16 RSG; PD stent placed
DGW: 25 (18); RSG: 22 (16)
Herreros de Tejada et al[29], 2009No cannulation after 5 attemptsExperience from 6 years to 30 years188DGW: 69.5 ± 15.6; RSG: 65.8 ± 15.5DGW: 38 (39); RSG: 38 (42)DGW: 97; RSG: 91DGW: 46 (47); RSG: 51 (56)DGW: 0; RSG: 5 (6)DGW: 1; RSG: 1DGW: 13 (17); RSG: 7 (8)
Kylänpää et al[30], 2021No cannulation after 5 minutes, > 5 contacts with papilla or > 1 unintended entry into PDNot defined203DGW: 68 ± 24.92; TPS: 66 ± 21.97DGW: 40 (40.4); TPS: 58 (55.7)DGW: 99; TPS: 104DGW: 66 (66.7); TPS: 81 (77.9)DGW: 1; TPS: 0DGW: 1; TPS: 2DGW: 16 (16.2); TPS: 14 (13.5)PD stent in 11 (DGW), 8.7 (TPBS)
Maeda et al[31], 2003No cannulation after 10 minutesNot defined53DGW: 64; RSG: 64DGW: 26 (40); RSG: 29 (45.3)DGW: 27; RSG: 26DGW: 25 (92.6); RSG: 14 (53.8)DGW: 0; RSG: 0
Yoo et al[32], 2013No cannulation after 10 attemptsNot defined71DGW: 67 ± 11.5; TPS: 63.7 ± 16.5DGW: 18 (52.9); TPS: 23 (62.2)DGW: 34; TPS: 37DGW: 27 (79.4); TPS: 29 (78.4)DGW: 1 (2.9); TPS: 2 (5.4)0/0DGW: 13 (38.2); TPS: 4 (10.8)No PD stent
Coté[33], 2012No cannulation in 6 minutes or PD cannulation 3 timesNot defined87DGW: 58.1 ± 17.2; PDS: 57.4 ± 16.9N/ADGW: 42; PDS: 54DGW: 16 (38.1); PDS: 26 (57.8)DGW: 0; PDS: 0DGW: 0; PDS: 0DGW: 1; PDS: 3
Sugiyama et al[36], 2018No cannulation within 15 minutes or PD cannulation > 3 times3 years’ experience; > 300 ERCP per year68TPS: 69.8 ± 9.3; DGW: 67 ± 11.3TPS: 18 (52.9); DGW: 19 (55.9)TPS: 34; DGW: 34TPS: 33 (94.1); DGW: 20 (58.8)TPS: 0; DGW: 0TPS: 0; DGW: 0TPS: 1 (2.9); DGW: 1 (2.9)PD stent placed in all
Zang et al[37], 2014No cannulation within 10 minutes or PD cannulation up to 5 timesNot defined149TPS: 53.7 ± 9.2; NKS: 54.6 ± 10.8TPS: 36 (49.3); NKS: 35 (46)TPS: 73; NKS: 76TPS: 70 (95.9); NKS: 64 (84.2)TPS: 1 (1.4); NKS: 3 (3.9)TPS: 0; NKS: 0TPS: 6 (6.8); NKS: 5 (6.6)No PD stent; All wire guided cannulations


Write to the Help Desk