©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Figure 3 Comparison of local recurrence free probability and overall survival between microwave ablation and multibipolar radio frequency.
A: Red line represents cumulative local progression-free survival for microwave ablation; black line represents cumulative local progression-free survival for multibipolar radiofrequency ablation. Levels of significance: P < 0.001 (inverse probability of treatment weighting mixed effects cox regression); B: Red line represent overall survival for microwave ablation; black line represents overall survival for multibipolar radiofrequency ablation. Levels of significance: P = 0.256 (inverse probability of treatment weighting mixed effects cox regression). MO: Microwave ablation; RF: Multibipolar radiofrequency ablation.
- Citation: Bahloul C, Rode A, Pradat P, Milot L, Dumortier J, Merle P, Mabrut JY, Boussel L, Della Corte A. Multibipolar radiofrequency vs single needle microwave ablation for the treatment of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113810
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i2/113810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810