©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810
Table 1 Baseline characteristics of the patient cohort (n = 362) used for analysis of secondary outcomes and the nodules cohort (n = 436) used to assess local tumor progression, n (%)
| Characteristics | Patients (n = 362) | Nodules (n = 436) | ||||
| MWA (n = 120) | Mbp-RFA (n = 242) | P value | MWA (n = 147) | Mbp-RFA (n = 289) | P value | |
| Age in years (IQR) | 65.52 (59.1-71.7) | 66.33 (59.3-72.2) | P = 0.81 | |||
| Male | 97 (80.8) | 211 (87.2) | P = 0.11 | |||
| Cirrhosis | 117 (97.5) | 226 (93.4) | P = 0.1 | |||
| Cirrhosis aetiologies | ||||||
| Viral hepatitis | 19 (15.8) | 44 (18.2) | P = 0.91 | |||
| NASH | 23 (19.2) | 44 (18.2) | ||||
| Alcoholic | 41 (34.2) | 74 (30.6) | ||||
| Other/mixed | 20 (16.7) | 39 (16.1) | ||||
| Child Pugh | ||||||
| Child Pugh A | 99 (82.5) | 211 (87.2) | P = 0.23 | |||
| Child Pugh B | 21 (17.5) | 31 (12.8) | ||||
| Platelet count | ||||||
| < 100 G/L | 47 (39.2) | 82 (33.9) | P = 0.32 | |||
| ≥ 100 G/L | 73 (60.8) | 160 (66.1) | ||||
| AFP | ||||||
| < 10 ng/mL | 86 (71.7) | 159 (65.7) | P = 0.39 | |||
| 10-100 ng/mL | 27 (22.5) | 60 (24.8) | ||||
| > 100 ng/mL | 7 (5.8) | 23 (9.5) | ||||
| Number of nodules treated per patient | 1.41 | 1.34 | P = 0.16 | |||
| Histological proof | 41 (34.2) | 198 (81.8) | P < 0.005 | |||
| Size | ||||||
| < 20mm | 69 (46.9) | 93 (32.2) | P < 0.001 | |||
| 20-30 mm | 55 (37.4) | 108 (37.4) | ||||
| ≥ 30 mm | 23 (15.6) | 88 (30.4) | ||||
| Tumour near large vessel | 20 (13.6) | 36 (12.5) | P = 0.735 | |||
| Subcapsular tumour | 74 (50.3) | 167 (57.8) | P = 0.139 | |||
| Proximity to the gallbladder | 4 (2.7) | 18 (6.2) | P = 0.114 | |||
| Segmental portal thrombosis | 0 | 3 (1) | P = 0.554 | |||
| Operator experience (months) | 107 (38-360) | 303 (105-331) | P = 0.026 | |||
| Guidance modality | ||||||
| By ultrasound alone | 49 (33.3) | 288 (99.7) | P < 0.001 | |||
| By scanner alone | 7 (4.8) | 1 (0.3) | ||||
| Mixed guidance (ultrasound + scanner) | 91 (61.9) | 0 | ||||
| Nodules treated per center | P < 0.001 | |||||
| Institution A | 35 (23.8) | 289 (100) | ||||
| Institution B | 112 (76.2) | 0 (0) | ||||
- Citation: Bahloul C, Rode A, Pradat P, Milot L, Dumortier J, Merle P, Mabrut JY, Boussel L, Della Corte A. Multibipolar radiofrequency vs single needle microwave ablation for the treatment of newly diagnosed hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113810
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i2/113810.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113810