©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Jan 14, 2026; 32(2): 113071
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071
Published online Jan 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071
Table 2 Comparative outcomes table between entero-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography, endoscopic ultrasound, and percutaneous transhepatic biliary drainage
| Modality | Billroth II gastrectomy | RYGB | Post-Whipple and hepaticojejunostomy |
| Enteroscopy-assisted ERCP | Technical success: High, up to 97%. Clinical success: High. AE rates: Low. Procedural time: Shorter than other SAA, often using forward-viewing scopes | Technical success: 82.2%. Clinical success: Lower, 65.1% (intervention). AE rates: 5.7% (overall). Rare complications like hepatic subcapsular hematoma. Procedural time: Long and technically demanding due to long, tortuous limb | Technical success: 70%-90%. Clinical success: 88% (biliary). AE rates: Up to 11% (biliary), generally mild. Procedural time: Long and complex |
| EUS-guided biliary drainage | Technical success: Very high, 89.4% (for all EUS-BD methods). Clinical success: Very high, 96.2%. AE rates: 6%-20%. Procedural time: More efficient than failed ERCP attempts | Technical success: > 85%-90%, with EDGE reaching > 97.9%. Clinical success: > 80%. AE rates: 13.1% (for EDGE). Procedural time: Shorter and more efficient than enteroscopy, particularly for long-limb reconstructions | Technical success: 80%-90%. Clinical success: 85%-92%. AE rates: 10%-20%. Procedural time: More efficient as a rescue method |
| PTBD | Technical success: 90%-97% clinical success: High AE rates: < 15% (long term issues and reinterventions) procedural time: 1-2 hours | ||
- Citation: Cocca S, Casoni Pattacini G, Grova A, Esposito S, Lupo M, Ferrante M, Grande G, Guidotti C, Pigò F, Li Cavoli TV, Mussetto A, Piccoli M, Conigliaro R, Bertani H. Biliary drainage in patients with altered anatomy: Literature review of different endoscopic approaches. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(2): 113071
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i2/113071.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i2.113071