Traction-preclosure-assisted vs conventional endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial tumors: Safety, efficacy in a retrospective cohort (with video)

doi:10.3748/wjg.v32.i19.112955

Advanced Search

BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge

Home / Archive / Volume 32, Issue 19

This Article

(46)

(45)

(0)

(3)

(1)

(598)

Peer-Review Report of This Article

CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article

Academic Rules and Norms of This Article

Supplementary Materials of This Article

Citation of this article

Corresponding Author of This Article

Research Domain of This Article

Article-Type of This Article

Open-Access Policy of This Article

Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article

Journal Information of This Article

Publication Name

World Journal of Gastroenterology

ISSN

1007-9327

Publisher of This Article

Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Retrospective Cohort Study

Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license. No commercial re-use. See permissions. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc.

World J Gastroenterol. May 21, 2026; 32(19): 112955
Published online May 21, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i19.112955

Table 1 Comparison of basic clinical characteristics between the two groups, n (%)

Clinical characteristics	Control group (n = 129)	Experimental group (n = 85)	χ²/t/Z	P value
Age, years, median (IQR)	56.0 (12.5)	56.0 (11.0)	Z = 0.621	0.535
Sex			χ² = 0.946	0.331
Male	43 (33.3)	23 (27.1)
Female	86 (66.7)	62 (72.9)
Weight, kg, median (IQR)	60.0 (14.0)	60.0 (13.5)	Z = 0.165	0.869
BMI, kg/m², mean ± SD	23.0 ± 2.9	23.4 ± 3.4	t = -1.096	0.274
ASA classification			χ² = 0.183	0.669
I/II	119 (92.2)	77 (90.6)
III/IV	10 (7.8)	8 (9.4)
Comorbidities			χ² = 1.633	0.201
Yes	28 (21.7)	25 (29.4)
No	101 (78.3)	60 (70.6)
Size of tumor, cm, median (IQR)	1.5 (1.0)	1.2 (1.0)	Z = 1.765	0.078
Site of tumor			χ² = 6.661	0.084
Cardia	17 (13.2)	5 (5.9)
Fundus	56 (43.4)	39 (45.9)
Gastric body	44 (34.1)	38 (44.7)
Antrum	12 (9.3)	3 (3.5)
Pathological types			χ² = 1.691	0.429
Stromal tumor	111 (86.0)	74 (87.1)
Leiomyoma	11 (8.5)	4 (4.7)
Alternative	7 (5.4)	7 (8.2)

BMI: Body mass index (height/weight²); ASA classification: American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification system; IQR: Interquartile range.

Full Size Table

Citation: Li X, Zhang RY, Wen XD, Li XQ, Liu WH. Traction-preclosure-assisted vs conventional endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial tumors: Safety, efficacy in a retrospective cohort (with video). World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(19): 112955
URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i19/112955.htm
DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i19.112955

Li X, Zhang RY, Wen XD, Li XQ, Liu WH. Traction-preclosure-assisted vs conventional endoscopic full-thickness resection for gastric subepithelial tumors: Safety, efficacy in a retrospective cohort (with video). World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(19): 112955 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i19.112955]

All content on this site: Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, its licensors, and contributors. All rights are reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For all open access content, the relevant licensing terms apply.