BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2026; 32(17): 118502
Published online May 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i17.118502
Table 2 Prognostic biomarkers of DNA methylation in gastrointestinal stromal tumors[32,41,73,75,79-82]
Ref.
Cohort/samples
Targets
Methodology
Key findings
Geddert et al[32]200 GISTsCD133 promoterMSP + IHCHypermethylation associated with reduced CD133 expression; paradoxically, CD133 expression predicted shorter DFS
Haller et al[75]150 GISTsSPP1 (osteopontin)Locus-specific assaysHypomethylation predicted poor DFS across size, site, and mitotic index
House et al[79]38 gastric GISTsE-cadherin (CDH1)MSP + proteinMethylation correlated with loss of E-cadherin and independently predicted recurrence/mortality
Ricci et al[80]Gastric GISTsp16INK4a promoterMSP + IHCHypermethylation linked to protein loss and poor outcome
Lou et al[81]115 casesREC8, PAX3, p16MCAM + validation≥ 1 gene methylated correlated with poor survival; site-specific patterns identified
Niinuma et al[41]91 casesMEG3Methylation + transcriptHypermethylation correlated with poor prognosis; restoration activated interferon responses
Ohshima et al[73]KIT exon 11 Δ557-558Genome-wideWGS + methylomeHypomethylation signature linked to CNV burden and p53 pathway inactivation; aggressive behavior
Kleijn et al[82]28 patientsGenome-wideEPIC methylome + CNVCNV burden and DMRs associated with progression; added to risk models


Write to the Help Desk