Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. May 7, 2026; 32(17): 117823
Published online May 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i17.117823
Published online May 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i17.117823
Figure 2 Kaplan-Meier analysis of progression-free survival based on autoantibody profiles.
A-C: Progression-free survival curves are shown for patient groups categorized by antinuclear antibody (ANA) status (A), extractable nuclear antigen (ENA) status (B), and the combined positive autoantibody criterion (ANA or ENA) (C); D: Carcinoembryonic antigen levels using a cutoff of 35.48; E: Carbohydrate antigen 199 levels using a cutoff of 41.65; F: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio using a cutoff of 6.63; G: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio using a cutoff of 202; H: Pan-immune-inflammation value using a cutoff of 1256; I: Systemic immune-inflammation index using a cutoff of 1400. PFS: Progression-free survival; ANA: Antinuclear antibody; ENA: Extractable nuclear antigen; CEA: Car cinoembryonic antigen; CA199: Carbohydrate antigen 199; NLR: Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; PLR: Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio; PIV: Pan-immune-inflammation value; SII: Systemic immune-inflammation index.
- Citation: Zheng PM, Ouyang LB, Wang R, Jing KY, Gao HJ, Zhu CK. Clinical significance of autoantibody profiling and systemic inflammation in predicting outcomes of gastric cancer patients undergoing immunotherapy. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(17): 117823
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i17/117823.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i17.117823