BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 28, 2026; 32(16): 116781
Published online Apr 28, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i16.116781
Table 3 Multivariate generalized estimation equations analysis of factors associated with a Rutgeerts score improvement (n = 71)
Variable
β
Robust SE
Wald χ²
OR (95%CI)
P value
Intercept-3.7091.3517.5320.025 (0.002-0.346)0.006
Treatment line
    First-line UST therapy (vs second-line)0.5460.2584.4981.727 (1.042-2.862)0.034
Montreal classification
    Age A2 (17-40 years) vs A1 (≤ 16 years)2.4111.1224.62111.149 (1.237-100.482)0.032
    Age A3 (> 40 years) vs A1 (≤ 16 years)1.0830.30112.9272.953 (1.637-5.329)< 0.001
    Location L2 (colonic) vs L1 (ileal)1.1711.0141.3343.225 (0.442-23.527)0.248
    Location L3 (ileocolonic) vs L1 (ileal)1.3421.0221.7253.827 (0.517-28.348)0.189
    Behavior B2 (stricturing) vs B1 (non-stricturing, non-penetrating)1.3250.6614.0233.764 (1.031-13.742)0.045
    Behavior B3 (penetrating) vs B1 (non-stricturing, non-penetrating)2.4591.2034.17911.692 (1.107-123.521)0.041
    Perianal disease (yes vs no)-1.2081.1651.0740.299 (0.030-2.934)0.300
Other clinical factors
    Extraintestinal manifestations (yes vs no)0.6130.4591.7831.847 (0.750-4.544)0.182
    Disease duration (years)-0.0210.00710.4310.979 (0.967-0.992)0.001
    Pre-UST Rutgeerts score0.6070.3313.3691.835 (0.960-3.509)0.066


Write to the Help Desk