Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2026; 32(14): 116415
Published online Apr 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116415
Published online Apr 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116415
Figure 5 Construction and evaluation of different machine-learning models.
A: The performance comparison of the five machine learning models on the training and test set was presented using radar plots; B: Receiver operating characteristic used to evaluate the CoxBoost model; C: Calibration curve of the CoxBoost model on the train set; D: Decision curve of the CoxBoost model on the train set. ACC: Accuracy; AUC: Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; DFS: Disease-free survival; GBM: Gradient boosting machine; LASSO: Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator; Pre: Precision; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; RSF: Random survival forest.
- Citation: Wang MR, Zheng LF, Yang F, Gu XY, Yang JS, Chen FX, Liu JM, He BS. Development and validation of prognostic models for colon cancer incorporating extramural vascular invasion assessed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(14): 116415
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i14/116415.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116415