Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 14, 2026; 32(14): 116041
Published online Apr 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116041
Published online Apr 14, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116041
Table 3 Performance of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System category classification between grade 3 and combined grade 4/5
| Data sets and metrics | AUC | Sensitivity, % | Specificity, % | Accuracy, % | F1 score |
| Center 1 | 0.918 | 97.9 | 85.7 | 95.2 | 0.969 |
| Center 2 | 0.826 | 93.8 | 71.4 | 88.2 | 0.923 |
| Center 3 | 0.861 | 92.1 | 80.0 | 90.4 | 0.943 |
- Citation: Xia XQ, Sheng RF, Zheng RC, Dai YX, Yang L, Chu YH, Zhang H, Wu XR, Shi NN, Wang CY, Zeng MS, Wang H. Evidence-based radiologist-supervised automated Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System categorization for the diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(14): 116041
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v32/i14/116041.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v32.i14.116041