BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Observational Study
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Gastroenterol. Apr 7, 2026; 32(13): 115710
Published online Apr 7, 2026. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v32.i13.115710
Table 3 Performance of different diagnostic modalities

Sensitivity (95%CI)
Specificity (95%CI)
Identification of mucinous neoplasms among all PCLs
    Integrated prediction model62.7% (50.4%-75.1%)95.2% (88.8%-100%)
    KRAS/GNAS mutation panel40.7% (28.1%-53.2%)100% (100%-100%)
    Clinical characteristics and serum markers37.3% (24.9%-49.6%)95.2% (88.8%-100%)
Identification of IPMNs among all PCLs
    Integrated prediction model82.6% (67.1%-98.1%)100% (100%-100%)
    KRAS/GNAS mutation panel52.2% (31.8%-72.6%)100% (100%-100%)
    Clinical characteristics and serum markers78.3% (61.4%-95.1%)80.8% (72.0%-89.5%)
Identification of mucinous neoplasms among PCLs in pancreatic head
    Integrated prediction model87.5% (71.3%-100%)100% (100%-100%)
    KRAS/GNAS mutation panel56.2% (31.9%-80.6%)100% (100%-100%)
    Clinical characteristics and serum markers62.5% (38.8%-86.2%)100% (100%-100%)
Identification of IPMNs among PCLs
    Integrated prediction model84.6% (65%-100%)100% (100%-100%)
    KRAS/GNAS mutation panel46.2% (19.1%-73.3%)100% (100%-100%)
    Clinical characteristics and serum markers69.2% (44.1%-94.3%)92.9% (79.4%-100%)


Write to the Help Desk