BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Review
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 28, 2025; 31(44): 111160
Published online Nov 28, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i44.111160
Table 9 Summary of prospective studies on computer-aided diagnosis for the characterization of colorectal polyps[194,200,201,208,209,239-243]
Ref.
Country
AI system
Number
WLI/IEE
Primary outcomes
Results
Gross et al[239]GermanySVM434 small polyps (< 10 mm)Magnifying NBIAdenomas vs non adenomas (small polyps)Se: 95%; Sp: 90%; PPV: 93%; NPV: 92%; Acc: 93%
Kominami et al[240]JapanSVM1262 polyps, 118 imagesMagnifying NBIAdenomas vs non adenomas (small polyps)Se: 93%; Sp: 95%; PPV: 95%; NPV: 93%; Acc: 97%
Mori et al[194]JapanEndoBRAIN61952 images, 466 polypsEndocytoscopy, NBIAdenomas vs non adenomas (DP)Se: 95%; Sp: 92%; PPV: 96%; NPV: 96%; Acc: 98%
Barua et al[208]Norway, United Kingdom, JapanEndoBRAIN892 polypsWLI, NBI, magnificationNeoplastic vs non neoplastic polyps (DP)Se: 90%; Sp: 86%
Hassan et al[242]ItalyGI genius544 polypsNBI, BLIAdenomas vs non adenomas (DP)NPV: 98%; Se: 82%; Sp: 93%; Acc: 92%
Minegishi et al[200]JapanEndoBRAIN395 polypsNBIAdenomas vs non adenomas (DP)NPV: 94%; Se: 94%; Sp: 63%; Acc: 86%
Rondonotti et al[209]ItalyCAD EYE596 polypsWLIAdenomas vs non adenomas (DP)NPV: 91%; Se: 89%; Sp: 88%; Acc: 88%
Li et al[241]Singapore (multicenter)CAD EYE661 polypsWLINeoplastic vs non neoplastic polypsSe: 62%; Acc: 72%
Hassan et al[242]ItalyCAD EYE; GI genius (head-to-head comparison)319 polypsWLI, BLIAdenomas vs non adenomas (DP)NPV: 97% vs 98%; Se: 82% vs 86%; Sp: 92% vs 94%
Houwen et al[201]Netherlands (multicenter) + Spain (1 center)POLAR423 polypsNBINeoplastic (adenomas and SSLs) vs non neoplasticSe: 89%; Sp: 38%; Acc: 79%
Rex et al[243]United States (multicenter)GI genius2695 polypsWLI, NBIAdenomas vs non adenomasSe: 91%; Sp: 65%


Write to the Help Desk