BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 21, 2025; 31(43): 112076
Published online Nov 21, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i43.112076
Table 2 Association between sarcopenia and waitlist mortality in end-stage liver disease: Summary of prevalence rates, effect measures, and outcomes from studies evaluating the impact of sarcopenia on waitlist mortality among patients with end-stage liver disease
Ref.
Prevalence of sarcopenia
Association with waitlist mortality
Effect measure
Result
Carey et al[25], 201745%, 42% male and 54% femaleSignificantHRHR per 1 cm2/m2 increase = 0.95 (95%CI: 0.92-0.98), P < 0.001, meaning a 5% risk reduction per unit increase in SMI; lower SMI indicates higher mortality risk
Sinclair et al[29], 201930, 9%Significant HRHR per 1 kg/m2 increase in ALMI = 0.78 (95%CI: 0.62-0.98), P = 0.03. Indicates a 22% reduction in waitlist mortality risk with each unit increase in ALMI; sarcopenia is associated with increased risk
Kappus et al[30], 202017, 2%Not significantHRHR = 0.98 (95%CI: 0.95-1.02), P = 0.41. No significant association between sarcopenia and waitlist mortality
Ebadi et al[34], 201822% (PMI-defined); 51% male/36% female (SMI)Female: Both low SMI and PMI significant; male: Low SMI significant and PMI not significantHRSarcopenia defined by SMI was significantly associated with increased waitlist mortality in both male (HR = 2.46, 95%CI: 1.38-4.39; P = 0.002) and female (HR = 2.05, 95%CI: 1.00-4.21; P = 0.05). Sarcopenia defined by PMI was significantly associated with mortality in females (HR = 2.47; 95%CI: 1.24-4.95; P = 0.01), but not in males (HR = 0.85; P = 0.09)
Alconchel et al[35], 2020Not reportedNot significantNot reported/no significant associationPMI was not representative of sarcopenia and failed to predict waitlist mortality


Write to the Help Desk