BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Letter to the Editor
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2025; 31(42): 112566
Published online Nov 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112566
Table 2 Phase 2 randomized controlled trial design for mild to moderate active ulcerative colitis
Design requirements
Specific protocol
Key considerations
Study designMulticenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trialCompliance with ICH-GCP standards
Target populationPatients with mild to moderate active UC (PRO2 score 2-5 points)Balance baseline risk; standardize severity assessment
Inclusion criteriaAge 18-65 yr; MES score 1-2 points; discontinue biologics ≥ 8 wkExclude severe UC and active infectious diseases
Sample size180 subjects (90 per group)80% statistical power; anticipated 15% dropout rate[23]
Randomization design1:1 randomized allocation by disease severity stratificationEnsure balanced baseline characteristics and reduce bias
Treatment groupsGroup A: 5-ASA + STS (extracellular H2O2 scavenger); Group B: 5-ASA + placeboSpecific dosing regimens determined through phase 1 dose-escalation studies
Biomarker assessmentsWeeks 0, 4, 8, 12: CRP, fecal calprotectin, neutrophil count, serum 8-isoprostane F2α, malondialdehyde, GPx activityBased on STRIDE-II criteria[24]; combined oxidative stress biomarkers
Primary endpointClinical response rate at week 12 (PRO2 score reduction ≥ 50%)Meets STRIDE-II recommended patient-reported outcome measures
Key secondary endpointsClinical remission, endoscopic response, histological improvement, oxidative stress biomarker changes at week 12Endoscopic response: MES ≤ 1 point; Histological improvement: Geboes score < 2.0
Safety assessmentLiver and kidney function tests at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12; document and evaluate adverse events at each visitBalance safety monitoring requirements with patient convenience
Follow-up planTreatment period: 12 wk + long-term follow-up to 52 wkEvaluate long-term efficacy maintenance and safety


Write to the Help Desk