©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 14, 2025; 31(42): 112180
Published online Nov 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112180
Published online Nov 14, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112180
Table 2 Performance of 10 machine learnings for predicting myelosuppression after first-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer
| MLs | AUC (95%CI) | AUPRC (95%CI) | Accuracy (%) | Sensitivity (%) | Specificity (%) | F1 score | PPV | NPV |
| Training set | ||||||||
| Adaptive boosting | 0.88 (0.85-0.91) | 0.79 (0.73-0.84) | 0.79 | 0.49 | 0.94 | 0.61 | 0.81 | 0.78 |
| Artificial neural network | 0.96 (0.95-0.97) | 0.94 (0.91-0.96) | 0.73 | 0.53 | 0.83 | 0.57 | 0.61 | 0.78 |
| Decision tree | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Extra trees | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) | 1.00 (1.00-1.00) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Gradient boosting machine | 0.99 (0.99-1.00) | 0.99 (0.99-1.00) | 0.98 | 0.93 | 0.99 | 0.96 | 0.99 | 0.97 |
| K-Nearest neighbors | 0.91 (0.89-0.93) | 0.79 (0.75-0.84) | 0.90 | 0.85 | 0.92 | 0.85 | 0.85 | 0.92 |
| Logistic regression | 0.75 (0.71-0.79) | 0.57 (0.50-0.65) | 0.69 | 0.25 | 0.92 | 0.35 | 0.61 | 0.70 |
| Random forest | 1.00 (0.99-1.00) | 1.00 (0.99-1.00) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Support vector machine | 0.87 (0.83-0.90) | 0.79 (0.73-0.84) | 0.68 | 0.05 | 1.00 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.67 |
| Extreme gradient boosting | 1.00 (0.99-1.00) | 1.00 (0.99-1.00) | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
| Validation set | ||||||||
| Adaptive boosting | 0.83 (0.76-0.89) | 0.72 (0.60-0.85) | 0.78 | 0.35 | 0.95 | 0.47 | 0.71 | 0.79 |
| Artificial neural network | 0.69 (0.60-0.78) | 0.61 (0.48-0.74) | 0.65 | 0.42 | 0.75 | 0.40 | 0.39 | 0.77 |
| Decision tree | 0.70 (0.62-0.78) | 0.52 (0.41-0.64) | 0.82 | 0.81 | 0.83 | 0.72 | 0.65 | 0.92 |
| Extra trees | 0.94 (0.89-0.97) | 0.90 (0.82-0.96) | 0.87 | 0.72 | 0.93 | 0.76 | 0.79 | 0.89 |
| Gradient boosting machine | 0.92 (0.86-0.97) | 0.90 (0.84-0.95) | 0.83 | 0.67 | 0.89 | 0.69 | 0.71 | 0.88 |
| K-Nearest neighbors | 0.75 (0.67-0.83) | 0.62 (0.48-0.74) | 0.80 | 0.70 | 0.85 | 0.67 | 0.64 | 0.88 |
| Logistic regression | 0.67 (0.59-0.76) | 0.49 (0.38-0.65) | 0.68 | 0.20 | 0.86 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.74 |
| Random forest | 0.96 (0.93-0.98) | 0.93 (0.87-0.97) | 0.88 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 0.78 | 0.84 | 0.90 |
| Support vector machine | 0.75 (0.67-0.83) | 0.65 (0.52-0.77) | 0.75 | 0.12 | 1.00 | 0.21 | 1.00 | 0.74 |
| Extreme gradient boosting | 0.97 (0.94-0.99) | 0.92 (0.83-0.99) | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.92 | 0.79 | 0.79 | 0.92 |
- Citation: Liu YM, Du YY, Song Y, Xiong HT, Yu HB, Li BH, Cai L, Ma SS, Gao J, Zhang HY, Fang RY, Cai R, Zheng HG. Predicting chemotherapy-induced myelosuppression in colorectal cancer: An interpretable, machine learning-based nomogram. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(42): 112180
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i42/112180.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i42.112180