©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Gastroenterol. Nov 7, 2025; 31(41): 111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Published online Nov 7, 2025. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184
Figure 7 Examples of segmentation output visualizations of the top-two- and worst-performing models of each model category on the EDD2020 dataset.
Light blue: Fully overlapping regions; Medium blue: Two-map overlaps; Dark blue: Single-map regions; Pink: Barrett’s esophagus ground truth masks; Lime: Suspicious regions ground truth masks; Blue: High-grade dysplasia ground truth masks; Yellow: Cancer; PVTV2: Pyramid vision transformer v2; Sus: Suspicious precancerous lesions; EMCAD: Efficient multi-scale convolutional decoding; HGD: High-grade dysplasia; BE: Barrett’s esophagus.
- Citation: Chan IN, Wong PK, Yan T, Hu YY, Chan CI, Qin YY, Wong CH, Chan IW, Lam IH, Wong SH, Li Z, Gao S, Yu HH, Yao L, Zhao BL, Hu Y. Assessing deep learning models for multi-class upper endoscopic disease segmentation: A comprehensive comparative study. World J Gastroenterol 2025; 31(41): 111184
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/1007-9327/full/v31/i41/111184.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v31.i41.111184